AUGMENTED AND VIRTUAL REALITY IN RADIOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Hafsa Bhatti BS Biotechnology, BS Biotechnology Graduate, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences - UVAS Lahore Author
  • Muhammad Moeed Azwar Bhatti Final Year MBBS Student HITEC IMS Taxila, Final Year MBBS Student HITEC IMS Taxila, Heavy Industry Taxila Educational Complex Institute Of Medical Sciences (HITEC-IMS) Author
  • Mahmood Ali Final year MBBS student at HITEC IMS, Heavy Industry Taxila Educational Complex Institute of Medical Sciences (HITEC-IMS) Author
  • Dr. Shayan Shahid MBBS, House-Officer, Heavy Industry Taxila Educational Complex Institute of Medical Sciences (HITEC-IMS) Author
  • Dr. Mubashir Javed MBBS, House officer Heavy Industry Taxila Educational Complex Institute of Medical Sciences (HITEC-IMS) Author
  • Dr. Shehryar Ali MBBS, House officer, Heavy Industry Taxila Educational Complex Institute of Medical Sciences (HITEC-IMS) Author
  • Ambreen Babar BS Biotechnology, BS Biotechnology Graduate, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences - UVAS Lahore Author
  • Khadija BS Biochemistry, BS Biochemistry Graduate, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences - UVAS Lahore Author
  • Talha Nazir BS Biotechnology, BS Biotechnology Graduate, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences - UVAS Lahore Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62019/0zz6fy70

Keywords:

Virtual Reality (VR), Radiology, Medical Imaging, Procedural Planning, Surgical Planning

Abstract

The accumulation of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in radiology is transforming procedural planning, medical imaging, and diagnostics. These state of art technologies offer immersive and interactive experiences, enhancing precision in interventional radiology, medical education, and surgical planning. AR aids with vascular intervention, tumor localization, and precise medicine by overlaying imaging data onto the patient’s body in real-time. Virtual reality (VR) offers 3D holographic recreation of complicated anatomical structures to enhance medical training and diagnostic precision.

Despite of proficient benefits of AR and VR there are many drawbacks of their usage in radiology, for example hindrances in the smooth integration with current workflows, high installation costs, and hardware problems. As AR is best suited for real-time procedural guidance, in contrary VR is excellent for education and in-depth image analysis.
AR/VR both could be efficient in reducing diagnostic errors, refining strategies for surgeries, and patient outcomes. For amplifying the usage of AR/VR in clinical applications there is need of development in AI integration, user-friendly designs, and cost-effective solutions. To authenticate long term benefits, large-scale clinical studies are essential, while efforts to enhance accessibility will play crucial role in determining the widespread adoption. Evolution in AR and VR has potential to redefine radiology, eventually bridging the gap between technology and patient-centered care. Both technologies can improve surgical techniques, decrease diagnostic mistakes, and enhance patient outcomes.

The research and development in AI integration, user-friendly designs, and affordable solutions can lead to the expansion of their clinical application. The efforts to improve accessibility can lead to wide recognition of these technologies, while vast clinical research is required to confirm their long-term advantages. As AR and VR develop further, they could revolutionize radiology by bringing technology and patient-centered treatment together.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

AUGMENTED AND VIRTUAL REALITY IN RADIOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES. (2025). Journal of Medical & Health Sciences Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.62019/0zz6fy70

Similar Articles

1-10 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.