DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF FAST SCAN IN PATIENT WITH BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA KEEPING CECT ABDOMEN AS GOLD STANDARD

Authors

  • Dr Hamza Manzoor Post Graduate Resident Radiology Department, CMH Muzaffarabad AJK Author
  • Dr Iffat Ara Associate Professor / Supervisor Radiology Department, CMH Muzaffarabad AJK Author
  • Dr Soum Maqsood Post Graduate Resident Pediatrics Department, CMH Muzaffarabad AJK Author
  • Dr Muhammad Tahir Khan Post Graduate Resident Radiology Department, PINS Lahore Author
  • Dr Muntaha Maqsood Assistant Professor, AJK Medical College Muzaffarabad AJK Author
  • Dr Tahir Lone Consultant Oncologist, AIMS hospital Muzaffarabad AJK Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62019/c0tx7x94

Keywords:

FAST, CECT Abdomen, Blunt Abdomen Injuries, Ultrasonography, Diagnostic Accuracy

Abstract

Introduction: Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. FAST is a non-invasive ultrasound modality primarily employed to detect free intra-peritoneal fluid suggestive of heamoperitoneum. CECT abdomen is used in stable patients for its superior ability to delineate solid organ injuries, retroperitoneal involvement, and vascular compromise. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of FAST compared to CECT in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, using CECT findings as the gold standard.

 

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted at CMH Muzaffarabad from September 19, 2023, to March 18, 2024, involving 140 patients with history of blunt abdominal trauma. Ultrasonography (FAST scan) was used initially for screening the trauma patients for the presence or absence of free intra-peritoneal fluid. CECT abdomen was performed to detect any free intra-peritoneal fluid and visceral injury which serve as a gold standard. Parameters assessed included sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy.

Results: In a study with 140 patients, 85% were male and 15% were female, with a mean age of 29.0071 ±10.42 years. The types of trauma experienced were predominantly Road traffic accident (65.7%), History of Fall (28.5%), Assault (5.7%). The FAST scan results revealed that 40% of the patients had positive findings, while 60% had negative findings. In comparison, CECT findings were positive in 35% and negative in 65% of the cases.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the FAST scan is a valuable tool in the rapid assessment of abdominal trauma. However, its diagnostic limitations, necessitate cautious interpretation. The integration of FAST with other diagnostic modalities, continued operator training, and possibly the adoption of advanced techniques may improve outcomes in trauma care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF FAST SCAN IN PATIENT WITH BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA KEEPING CECT ABDOMEN AS GOLD STANDARD. (2025). Journal of Medical & Health Sciences Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.62019/c0tx7x94

Similar Articles

1-10 of 36

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.